[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <b7da2f$qco1ng@fmsmga001.fm.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 09:32:09 +0000
From: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To: Indan Zupancic <indan@....nu>,
Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Commit 500f7147cf5bafd139056d521536b10c2bc2e154 breaks _resume_
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 03:56:36 +0100 (CET), "Indan Zupancic" <indan@....nu> wrote:
> All in all it seems quite wrong, no matter if it happens to work, because
> it depends on the calling order done by the drm layer. If *_crtc_enable()
> is called instead it won't do anything because of that active = true thing.
> This seems to be happening in your case.
The order is very well defined.
modesetting (upon resume we set the previous mode):
for each enabled crtc:
crtc_helper->prepare -> intel_crtc_disable()
crtc->mode_set -> intel_crtc_mode_set()
crtc_helper->commit -> intel_crtc_enable()
for each !enabled crtc:
crtc->disable -> intel_crtc_disable()
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists