[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1297250263.13327.159.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 12:17:43 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Trinabh Gupta <trinabh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: arjan@...ux.intel.com, lenb@...nel.org, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, venki@...gle.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V3 2/3] cpuidle: list based cpuidle driver
registration and selection
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 16:22 +0530, Trinabh Gupta wrote:
> A cpuidle_driver is global in nature as it provides routines
> for all the CPUS. Each CPU registered with the cpuidle subsystem is
> represented as a cpuidle_device. A cpuidle_device structure
> points to the low level idle routines for that CPU provided by
> a certain driver. In other words, a cpuidle driver creates a
> cpuidle_device structure for each CPU that it registers with the
> cpuidle subsystem. Whenever cpuidle idle loop is called, the cpuidle
> subsystem picks the cpuidle_device structure for that cpu and
> calls one of the low level idle routines through that structure.
Why all this per-cpu nonsense? I thought we all agreed that ACPI tables
specifying non-uniform C states were considered buggy and we should
simply use the intersection of all cpus.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists