linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: make scsi_devinfo infrastructure optional

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 09 Feb 2011 12:00:08 -0600
From:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
To:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: make scsi_devinfo infrastructure optional

On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 15:15 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Add SCSI_QUIRKS config option (default y and dependent on EMBEDDED
> config option) to allow disabling of scsi_devinfo infrastructure.
> 
> The output code size savings are ~14k for CONFIG_SCSI_QUIRKS=n
> (as measured on x86-32):

I don't understand the point of this patch ... without the quirks SCSI
will do the wrong thing on a whole bunch of stuff.  The savings look to
be tiny ... since the SCSI module is habitually a lot larger than your
figures suggest.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/