[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <987664A83D2D224EAE907B061CE93D53019D18D43A@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 11:03:35 -0800
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: RE: [RFC 1/2] lib, Make gen_pool memory allocator lockless
+static int set_bits_ll(unsigned long *addr, unsigned long mask_to_set)
+{
+ unsigned long val, nval;
+
+ nval = *addr;
+ do {
+ val = nval;
+ if (val & mask_to_set)
+ return -EBUSY;
+ } while ((nval = cmpxchg(addr, val, val | mask_to_set)) != val);
+
+ return 0;
+}
Spin loops like this should have a call to cpu_relax(), shouldn't they?
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists