[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1297283335.3016.48.camel@mulgrave.site>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:28:55 -0600
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.38-rc4 (target_core: rmmod GP fault)
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 12:20 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 14:13 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> > Firstly, could we get the serious bug fixes identified and separated
> > from the general enhancement updates, so they can go in a fixes tree
> > without depending on enhancements? The former category would include
> > the /proc interface removal, since we don't want the legacy interface to
> > be in a released kernel.
> >
>
> Everything in those two series should be considered bug fixes and
> immediate for-38 mainline material.
Things like this:
target: remove EXTRA_CFLAGS
target: Remove unnecessary container_of() pointer check
target: Remove unnecessary se_clear_dev_ports legacy code
target: Remove spurious double cast from structure macro accessors
target: Convert TMR REQ/RSP definitions to target namespace
target: Minor sparse warning fixes and annotations
target: Remove unneeded test of se_cmd
Are not serious bug fixes. I could go either way on some of the error path changes.
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists