[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1297359914.4933.56.camel@mulgrave.site>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:45:13 -0600
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
mark gross <markgross@...gnar.org>,
David Alan Gilbert <linux@...blig.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Len <len.brown@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] idle governor: Avoid lock acquisition to read pm_qos
before entering idle
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 17:21 -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> I noticed that before entering idle state, the menu idle governor will
> look up the current pm_qos value according to the list of qos request
> received. This look up currently needs the acquisition of a lock to go
> down a list of qos requests to find the qos value, slowing down the
> entrance into idle state due to contention by multiple cpus to traverse
> this list. The contention is severe when there are a lot of cpus waking
> and going into idle. For example, for a simple workload that has 32
> pair of processes ping ponging messages to each other, where 64 cores
> cores are active in test system, I see the following profile:
>
> - 37.82% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k]
> _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
> - _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
> - 95.65% pm_qos_request
> menu_select
> cpuidle_idle_call
> - cpu_idle
> 99.98% start_secondary
>
> Perhaps a better approach will be to cache the updated pm_qos value so
> reading it does not require lock acquisition as in the patch below.
>
> Tim
>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
What you say is true as long as the value is 32 bits ... perhaps a note
of that should be made somewhere?
Otherwise, it looks like a good lockless optimisation on the read path,
so you can add my ack.
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists