[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1102101901420.26035@swampdragon.chaosbits.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:07:47 +0100 (CET)
From: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
To: Tadashi Abe <tabe@...sta.com>
cc: x86@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix io_bitmap_ptr memory leak on copy_process()
On Tue, 8 Feb 2011, Tadashi Abe wrote:
> x86 copy_thread() allocates io_bitmap_ptr area in child's thread_struct
> when the parent has TIF_IO_BITMAP flag via ioperm().
> And in this case, if copy_process() terminates with errors
> after copy_thread() success,
> this io_bitmap_ptr area is being left without kfree().
>
> Signed-off-by: Tadashi Abe <tabe@...sta.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 6 ++++++
> include/linux/sched.h | 5 +++++
> kernel/fork.c | 4 +++-
> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> index b3feabc..290e98b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> @@ -122,6 +122,12 @@ void flush_thread(void)
> clear_used_math();
> }
>
> +void free_thread_struct(struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> + if (p->thread.io_bitmap_ptr)
> + kfree(p->thread.io_bitmap_ptr);
kfree(NULL) is perfectly legal, so the 'if' is not needed.
Why is this a new function? Why not simply call kfree() when needed.
> +}
> +
> static void hard_disable_TSC(void)
> {
> write_cr4(read_cr4() | X86_CR4_TSD);
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 23e9c27..2345391 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -2159,6 +2159,11 @@ extern int copy_thread(unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long,
> struct task_struct *, struct pt_regs *);
> extern void flush_thread(void);
> extern void exit_thread(void);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
> +extern void free_thread_struct(struct task_struct *p);
> +#else
> +#define free_thread_struct(p) do { } while (0)
> +#endif
>
This should just go away IMHO.
> extern void exit_files(struct task_struct *);
> extern void __cleanup_sighand(struct sighand_struct *);
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index 25e4291..ffcabf3 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -1179,7 +1179,7 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags,
> retval = -ENOMEM;
> pid = alloc_pid(p->nsproxy->pid_ns);
> if (!pid)
> - goto bad_fork_cleanup_io;
> + goto bad_fork_free_thread;
>
> if (clone_flags & CLONE_NEWPID) {
> retval = pid_ns_prepare_proc(p->nsproxy->pid_ns);
> @@ -1315,6 +1315,8 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags,
> bad_fork_free_pid:
> if (pid != &init_struct_pid)
> free_pid(pid);
> +bad_fork_free_thread:
> + free_thread_struct(p);
kfree(p);
and be done with it..
> bad_fork_cleanup_io:
> if (p->io_context)
> exit_io_context(p);
>
Perhaps I'm overlooking something, in which case I'd be happy to be
corrected, but I really can't see why this can't just be as simple as I
outlined above.
--
Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/
Plain text mails only, please.
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists