linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rfc4106, Intel, AES-NI: Don't leak memory in rfc4106_set_hash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:47:26 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
cc:	tadeusz.struk@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, aidan.o.mahony@...el.com,
	gabriele.paoloni@...el.com, adrian.hoban@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rfc4106, Intel, AES-NI: Don't leak memory in
 rfc4106_set_hash_subkey().

On Tue, 8 Feb 2011, Herbert Xu wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 05:32:59PM +0000, tadeusz.struk@...el.com wrote:
> >
> > Here goes.
> > 
> > Fix up previous patch that attempted to fix a mem leak in 
> > rfc4106_set_hash_subkey. The previous patch was flawed in that the 'goto 
> > out' would still leak.
> 
> Sign-off?
> 

Since it's identical to the patch I posted except for the moving of the 
kfree() which (IMHO) is a minor detail, I hope you can use my sign-off so 
we can move along and get the patch merged..

Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>


-- 
Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>            http://www.chaosbits.net/
Plain text mails only, please.
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/