[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1297373905.5226.31.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 22:38:25 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: perf on 2.6.38-rc4 wedges my box
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 12:38 -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying out willy's ata_ram driver[1], and in so doing have managed to
> wedge my box while using perf record on an aio-stress run:
>
> [root@...allica ~]# modprobe ata_ram capacity=2097152 preallocate=1
> [root@...allica ~]# ./aio-stress -O -o 0 -r 4 -d 32 -b 16 /dev/sds
> adding stage write
> starting with write
> file size 1024MB, record size 4KB, depth 32, ios per iteration 8
> max io_submit 16, buffer alignment set to 4KB
> threads 1 files 1 contexts 1 context offset 2MB verification off
> adding file /dev/sds thread 0
> write on /dev/sds (621.30 MB/s) 1024.00 MB in 1.65s
> thread 0 write totals (621.27 MB/s) 1024.00 MB in 1.65s
> [root@...allica ~]# perf record -- ./aio-stress -O -o 0 -r 4 -d 32 -b 16
> /dev/sds
> adding stage write
> starting with write
> file size 1024MB, record size 4KB, depth 32, ios per iteration 8
> max io_submit 16, buffer alignment set to 4KB
> threads 1 files 1 contexts 1 context offset 2MB verification off
> adding file /dev/sds thread 0
>
> and there it sits. On the console, I see:
>
> NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 100
> NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 100
> NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 100
> NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 100
> NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 100
>
> The number of messages varies, but this is the most I've seen (it
> doesn't keep repeating). At this point, the machine does not respond to
> pings. As I don't have physical access at the moment, I can't try
> alt-sysrq, but might be able to do that tomorrow. It's probably worth
> noting that I've witnessed similar behavior with real devices, so it's
> not just the ata_ram driver.
>
> Any ideas on how to track this down?
So I took linus' tree of about half an hour ago, added
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/willy/misc.git ata-ram
(fixed up some Kconfig/Makefile rejects), google'd aio-stress
(http://fsbench.filesystems.org/bench/aio-stress.c) and set out to
reproduce the above..
Sadly it all seems to work here, its spending ~15% in
_raw_spin_lock_irq, which when I use -g looks to break down like:
- 14.13% aio-stress [kernel.kallsyms] [k] _raw_spin_lock_irq
- _raw_spin_lock_irq
+ 44.14% __make_request
+ 20.91% __aio_get_req
+ 10.15% aio_run_iocb
+ 7.37% do_io_submit
+ 6.55% scsi_request_fn
+ 5.48% generic_unplug_device
+ 3.58% aio_put_req
+ 0.92% generic_make_request
+ 0.91% __generic_unplug_device
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists