[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1297375047-18608-2-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:57:27 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH powerpc 2/2] powerpc: mask smp_processor_id() false positive
The rtas_event_scan() function uses smp_processor_id() to select a
starting point in cpu_online_mask, and does so under the protection
of get_online_cpus(). This might not select the current processor
in any case, so switch to raw_smp_processor_id().
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/rtasd.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtasd.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtasd.c
index 049dbec..7980ec0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtasd.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtasd.c
@@ -412,7 +412,8 @@ static void rtas_event_scan(struct work_struct *w)
get_online_cpus();
- cpu = cpumask_next(smp_processor_id(), cpu_online_mask);
+ /* raw_ OK because just using CPU as starting point. */
+ cpu = cpumask_next(raw_smp_processor_id(), cpu_online_mask);
if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) {
cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
--
1.7.3.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists