[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1297296265-18680-1-git-send-email-ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 16:04:25 -0800
From: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
Subject: [PATCH] genirq: Call chip_bus_lock()/chip_bus_sync_unlock() in setup_irq().
irq_chips that supply .irq_bus_lock/.irq_bus_sync_unlock functions,
expect that the other chip methods will be called inside of calls to
the pair. If this expectation is not met, things tend to not work.
Make setup_irq() call chip_bus_lock()/chip_bus_sync_unlock() too.
For the vast majority of irq_chips, this will be a NOP as most don't
have these bus lock functions.
Signed-off-by: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
---
kernel/irq/manage.c | 7 ++++++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index 0caa59f..a00bf2c 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -871,9 +871,14 @@ out_thread:
*/
int setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irqaction *act)
{
+ int retval;
struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
- return __setup_irq(irq, desc, act);
+ chip_bus_lock(desc);
+ retval = __setup_irq(irq, desc, act);
+ chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
+
+ return retval;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(setup_irq);
--
1.7.2.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists