[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110211135906.GA16358@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:59:06 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/75] genirq: Overhaul for 2.6.39
* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> B1;2401;0cOn Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Feb 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > So yes, it's net more source lines, but not resulting in any binary
> > bloat.
>
> Just checked. When the compat layer goes away it will kill about 500
> lines. So it's less code with better encapsulation.
>
> Once all genirq archs convert to the generic irq_show_interrupts(),
> this will kill another 1000+ lines.
So while this is the first step:
> 29 files changed, 1353 insertions(+), 899 deletions(-)
It turns into this end result (mockup):
> 129 files changed, 1353 insertions(+), 2400 deletions(-)
Right? Or, more likely, considering all the surrounding code changes, something
like:
> 129 files changed, 4353 insertions(+), 5400 deletions(-)
Did I get the file count right - roughtly how many files are affected throughout all
architectures? The changes are massively intrusive and widely spread out so we
cannot do them in one go, right?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists