[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1297460297.5226.99.camel@laptop>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:38:17 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, hpa@...or.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de,
andi@...stfloor.org, roland@...hat.com, rth@...hat.com,
masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
avi@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, sam@...nborg.org,
ddaney@...iumnetworks.com, michael@...erman.id.au,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] jump label: 2.6.38 updates
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 16:13 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> Thoughts ?
#if defined(CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO) && defined(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL)
+
+struct jump_label_key {
+ void *ptr;
+};
struct jump_label_entry {
struct hlist_node hlist;
struct jump_entry *table;
- int nr_entries;
/* hang modules off here */
struct hlist_head modules;
unsigned long key;
+ u32 nr_entries;
+ int refcount;
};
#else
+struct jump_label_key {
+ int state;
+};
#endif
So why can't we make that jump_label_entry::refcount and
jump_label_key::state an atomic_t and be done with it?
Then the enabled case uses if (atomic_inc_return(&key->ptr->refcount) ==
1), and the disabled atomic_inc(&key->state).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists