[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D54EBE0.3050408@metafoo.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:57:20 +0100
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 17/75] genirq: Consolidate IRQ_DISABLED
On 02/11/2011 12:36 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Index: linux-2.6-tip/kernel/irq/chip.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-tip.orig/kernel/irq/chip.c
> +++ linux-2.6-tip/kernel/irq/chip.c
> @@ -192,11 +192,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(set_irq_nested_thread)
>
> int irq_startup(struct irq_desc *desc)
> {
> - desc->status &= ~(IRQ_MASKED | IRQ_DISABLED);
> + desc->status &= ~IRQ_DISABLED;
> desc->depth = 0;
>
> - if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_startup)
> - return desc->irq_data.chip->irq_startup(&desc->irq_data);
> + if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_startup) {
> + int ret = desc->irq_data.chip->irq_startup(&desc->irq_data);
> + desc->status &= IRQ_MASKED;
Although it is fixed in patch 45 of this series, I guess it should rather be
desc->status &= ~IRQ_MASKED here too.
> + return ret;
> + }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists