linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next/mmotm] net/can: fix softing build errors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110212111344.GA328@e-circ.dyndns.org>
Date:	Sat, 12 Feb 2011 12:15:04 +0100
From:	Kurt Van Dijck <kurt.van.dijck@....be>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next/mmotm] net/can: fix softing build errors

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:33:12PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> 
> warning: (CAN_SOFTING_CS) selects CAN_SOFTING which has unmet direct dependencies (NET && CAN && CAN_DEV && HAS_IOMEM)
> 
> with this partial config:
> 
> CONFIG_CAN=m
> # CONFIG_CAN_RAW is not set
> # CONFIG_CAN_BCM is not set
> # CAN Device Drivers
> # CONFIG_CAN_VCAN is not set
> CONFIG_CAN_SLCAN=m
> # CONFIG_CAN_DEV is not set
> CONFIG_CAN_SOFTING=m
> CONFIG_CAN_SOFTING_CS=m
> # CONFIG_CAN_DEBUG_DEVICES is not set
I understand the output, but I don't understand the cause well enough.
CAN_SOFTING=m has a 'depends on CAN_DEV'
Is it then possible to have CAN_SOFTING=m _and not_ CAN_DEV ?
> 

regards,
Kurt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/