[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r5bcnwvw.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 09:48:03 +0100
From: Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>
To: x32-abi@...glegroups.com
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, GCC Development <gcc@....gnu.org>,
GNU C Library <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: X32 psABI status
* H. Peter Anvin:
> On 02/12/2011 01:10 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Why is the ia32 compatiblity kernel interface used?
>
> Because there is no way in hell we're designing in a second
> compatibility ABI in the kernel (and it has to be a compatibility ABI,
> because of the pointer size difference.)
Actually, I'm wondering if you can do the translation in user space.
There already are 32-on-64 implementations in existence, without
kernel changes (recent Hotspot, LuaJIT, and probably some more).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists