[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110214112540.GE18742@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:25:40 +0100
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, brgerst@...il.com,
gorcunov@...il.com, shaohui.zheng@...el.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
mingo@...e.hu, hpa@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/26] x86-64, NUMA: Simplify hotplug node handling in
acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init()
Hello, Yinghai.
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 10:13:51AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > Eh? The oldnode thing will restore the node to initial state thus
> > fulfilling the node empty condition. Am I missing something?
> >
>
> yes. nd get restored, but it keep node_parsed set for that kind of node.
So, this is the code snippet. Both @nd->start and end are zero and
nodes_parsed for @node is clear.
nd = &nodes[node];
oldnode = *nd;
@oldnode->start, end == 0.
if (!node_test_and_set(node, nodes_parsed)) {
nd->start = start;
nd->end = end;
This path is taken and @nd->start and end are set.
} else {
if (start < nd->start)
nd->start = start;
if (nd->end < end)
nd->end = end;
}
printk(KERN_INFO "SRAT: Node %u PXM %u %lx-%lx\n", node, pxm,
start, end);
if (ma->flags & ACPI_SRAT_MEM_HOT_PLUGGABLE) {
update_nodes_add(node, start, end);
/* restore nodes[node] */
*nd = oldnode;
@nd->start and end are restored to zero.
if ((nd->start | nd->end) == 0)
node_clear(node, nodes_parsed);
and @nodes_parsed is cleared.
}
So, what the hell am I missing?
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists