[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTim3bSWKYcwoJ5+GCO-rPWfXgGEvS1JUbgKx+3f+@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 08:12:10 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, brgerst@...il.com,
gorcunov@...il.com, shaohui.zheng@...el.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
mingo@...e.hu, hpa@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/26] x86-64, NUMA: Simplify hotplug node handling in acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init()
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:25 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hello, Yinghai.
>
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 10:13:51AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> > Eh? The oldnode thing will restore the node to initial state thus
>> > fulfilling the node empty condition. Am I missing something?
>> >
>>
>> yes. nd get restored, but it keep node_parsed set for that kind of node.
>
> So, this is the code snippet. Both @nd->start and end are zero and
> nodes_parsed for @node is clear.
>
> nd = &nodes[node];
> oldnode = *nd;
>
> @oldnode->start, end == 0.
>
> if (!node_test_and_set(node, nodes_parsed)) {
> nd->start = start;
> nd->end = end;
> This path is taken and @nd->start and end are set.
> } else {
> if (start < nd->start)
> nd->start = start;
> if (nd->end < end)
> nd->end = end;
> }
>
> printk(KERN_INFO "SRAT: Node %u PXM %u %lx-%lx\n", node, pxm,
> start, end);
>
> if (ma->flags & ACPI_SRAT_MEM_HOT_PLUGGABLE) {
> update_nodes_add(node, start, end);
> /* restore nodes[node] */
> *nd = oldnode;
> @nd->start and end are restored to zero.
> if ((nd->start | nd->end) == 0)
> node_clear(node, nodes_parsed);
> and @nodes_parsed is cleared.
oh, i missed that restore happen first...
sorry.
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists