[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110214162115.GB6909@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:21:15 -0500
From: David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] dlm fix for 2.6.38
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 04:46:01PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:38:44AM -0500, David Teigland wrote:
> > find_lkb seems to be getting an actual, but wrong lkid, so it's returning
> > the wrong lkb in the receive routines. It happens fairly quickly with
> > multiple wq threads, but not at all with single. One suspect I'm going to
> > look at are the ls_stub and fields in the lockspace struct. I'm not
> > convinced extra send/recv threads give us that much benefit in practice,
> > so it's not my top priority at the moment.
>
> Hmmm... okay. At any rate, please use alloc[_ordered]_workqueue()
> interface. create[_singlethread]_workqueue() will be deprecated soon.
Oh, I'll switch to the other API in the patch set for the next merge.
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists