linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 15/26] x86-64, NUMA: Unify the rest of memblk registration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110214162247.GX18742@htj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:22:47 +0100
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, brgerst@...il.com,
	gorcunov@...il.com, shaohui.zheng@...el.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
	mingo@...e.hu, hpa@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/26] x86-64, NUMA: Unify the rest of memblk
 registration

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 08:17:46AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> why not do it at first point ?
> 
> numa_register_meminfo() should only take care of creating correctly
> struct numa_meminfo.

No, register meminfo doesn't create numa_meminfo.  It sets up system
states according to the configuration information in numa_meminfo, and
I really have no idea what you're arguing for or against.  What's your
point?

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/