linux-kernel - Re: Regression - Xorg start failed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTinFN6gmcNvoe=DQ3YPL=Bcj3pKCHO6ZzafE9uak@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:35:42 +0100
From:	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com>
To:	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Cc:	DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression - Xorg start failed

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org> wrote:
> * Sedat Dilek (sedat.dilek@...glemail.com) wrote:
>> [ As I am not subscribed to both MLs and lazy to pick up all involved people ]
>>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> The original patch had also this part (see the revert in [1]):
>> ...
>> +#include <linux/security.h>
>> ...
>>
>> Your new patch in [2] is missing it or is it not required?
>
> It was just a patch on top of the bad commit (47970b1b), the #include is
> required.
>
> thanks,
> -chris
>

OK, now I see.
Might be good to push a v2 as the initial patch was reverted in the meantime?
The explanations of the fixup patch were helpful (to me) and should be included.

- Sedat -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/