[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1297702394.5226.116.camel@laptop>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:53:14 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
hpa@...or.com, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de,
andi@...stfloor.org, roland@...hat.com, rth@...hat.com,
masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
avi@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, sam@...nborg.org,
ddaney@...iumnetworks.com, michael@...erman.id.au,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] jump label: 2.6.38 updates
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 11:46 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 17:37 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > We could of course cheat implement our own version of atomic_read() in
> > order to avoid the whole header mess, but that's not pretty at all
>
> Oh God please no! ;)
>
> atomic_read() is implemented per arch.
Ah, but it needn't be:
static inline int atomic_read(atomic_t *a)
{
return ACCESS_ONCE(a->counter);
}
is basically it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists