[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1102141958020.26192@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 20:01:43 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/75] genirq: Overhaul for 2.6.39
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 03:26:11PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > > > 129 files changed, 4353 insertions(+), 5400 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Did I get the file count right - roughtly how many files are affected throughout all
> > > architectures? The changes are massively intrusive and widely spread out so we
> > > cannot do them in one go, right?
> >
> > Alone the stuff which fiddles in irq_desc->status for whatever reasons
> > is >100 files in arch/. And that has do be done manually case by case.
>
> Some kind of arch TODO list wold be nice. Just to let the arch maintainers
> know what you expect from them (on top of the deprecated warnings).
One thing which can be done right now is to use the proper existing
accessors irq_to_desc(), irq_set/clear_status_flags().
The remaining fixes depend on the yet to be merged queue. I will do
the namespace cleanup with cocinelle after rc1 as this is purely
mechanical. The other few things which will be left need manual
attendance, I will post either patches or a TODO list.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists