linux-kernel - Re: [patch v2 0/3] OProfile support for System z's hardware sampling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110214194206.GW5874@erda.amd.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Feb 2011 20:42:06 +0100
From:	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
To:	Heinz Graalfs <graalfs@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
CC:	"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"oprofile-list@...ts.sf.net" <oprofile-list@...ts.sf.net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
	"borntraeger@...ibm.com" <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v2 0/3] OProfile support for System z's hardware
 sampling

Heinz,

On 21.01.11 05:06:51, Heinz Graalfs wrote:
> I'm resending yesterday's mail because I missed to specify the correct sender information.
> 
> This is a re-posting of the patch series originally posted last month:
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-s390&m=129285043619973&w=2
> 
> Heinz
> 
> Changes in
> 
> v2:
>    - kernel module hwsampler removed, everything is now in oprofile kernel module
>    - functions from hwsampler-main.c and smpctl.c merged into arch/s390/oprofile/hwsampler.c
>      - functions made static
>    - arch/s390/include/asm/hwsampler.h moved to arch/s390/oprofile/hwsampler.h
>      - structs have now hws_ prefix
>    - config variables changed, HAVE_HWSAMPLER used only
>    - original patch 4 (handle_munmap.patch) removed

thanks for you patches, I have applied them with modifications to:

 git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rric/oprofile.git s390

For atomic compilation of single patches I changed patch order and the
Makefile where necessary. The branch also includes my follow-on
patches.

I will be travelling the next weeks and wanted to have this series in
linux-next now for later inclusion to .39. We would run out of time
otherwise (my bad). Please review and test the changes I made and send
me possibly updates.

Though I applied the patches I want to have the following changes:

* Merge init.c and hwsampler_file.c, two files are bloated here and
  hwsampler_file.c is a bad and too long naming.

* Rework functions in cpu_buffer.c (log_sample,
  __oprofile_add_ext_sample, oprofile_add_ext_hw_sample, etc.). All
  the (static) functions can be merged to a single functino by
  implementing a struct that holds all current function arguments.
  Something like:

static void __oprofile_add_ext_sample(struct *foobar fb);
void oprofile_add_sample(struct pt_regs * const regs, unsigned long event)
{
	struct foobar fb = { .regs = regs, .event = event };
	__oprofile_add_ext_sample(&fb);
}

  The naming and description of oprofile_add_ext_hw_sample() is also
  not the best. As interface in include/linux/oprofile.h we could then
  merge oprofile_add_ext_sample() and oprofile_add_ext_hw_sample() to
  a single function.

It would be nice if you could implement this.

For all patches in the oprofile/s390 branch I also need the
s390 maintainer's ack.

Martin or Heiko, please ack.

Thanks,

-Robert

-- 
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/