[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1102142024460.6561@oceanic.wsisiz.edu.pl>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:03:10 +0100 (CET)
From: Lukasz Trabinski <lukasz@...binski.net>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: net.ipv6.route.max_size
Hello
IPv6 route table size is still growing. In stanard linux box configuration
with IPv6 BGP session (with ipv6 world table) and BGP application like Quagga,
we have problem like this:
2011/02/12 18:43:52 ZEBRA: netlink-cmd error: Cannot allocate memory,
type=RTM_NEWROUTE(24), seq=11124600, pid=0
This problem shows us that's all prefixes comes from BGP can't be install
into FIB
IN BGP application we can see, that's we recive 4484 prefixes from ipv6
neighbor:
cosmos> show bgp summary
Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down
State/PfxRcd
2001:1a68:0:c::1
4 24724 431945 70172 0 0 0 2d01h18m 4484
I suggest that net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_max_size should be increase.
Below _simple_ patch for this problem. I don't understand why in
ipv4/route we have different method to count ip4_rt_max_size? My
value 65536 in near future will be also wrong. I know also, that we can
change it by sysctl, but I thing that it's not good way to fix it.
--- route.c~ 2011-02-14 20:26:12.000000000 +0100
+++ route.c 2011-02-14 20:30:04.000000000 +0100
@@ -2708,7 +2708,7 @@
#endif
net->ipv6.sysctl.flush_delay = 0;
- net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_max_size = 4096;
+ net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_max_size = 65536;
net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_gc_min_interval = HZ / 2;
net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_gc_timeout = 60*HZ;
net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_gc_interval = 30*HZ;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists