[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110214171715.5f3c6cb4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:17:15 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the cleancache tree with Linus' tree
Hi Dan,
Today's linux-next merge of the cleancache tree got a conflict in
fs/super.c between commit d863b50ab01333659314c2034890cb76d9fdc3c7 ("vfs:
call rcu_barrier after ->kill_sb()") from Linus' tree and commit
03e838947c8abe29a9d7abfaf7fd9125a46b70e9 ("mm/fs: add hooks to support
cleancache") from the cleancache tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc fs/super.c
index 7e9dd4c,30a54e0..0000000
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@@ -30,7 -30,7 +30,8 @@@
#include <linux/idr.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/backing-dev.h>
+#include <linux/rculist_bl.h>
+ #include <linux/cleancache.h>
#include "internal.h"
@@@ -177,11 -178,7 +179,12 @@@ void deactivate_locked_super(struct sup
struct file_system_type *fs = s->s_type;
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&s->s_active)) {
fs->kill_sb(s);
+ /*
+ * We need to call rcu_barrier so all the delayed rcu free
+ * inodes are flushed before we release the fs module.
+ */
+ rcu_barrier();
+ cleancache_flush_fs(s);
put_filesystem(fs);
put_super(s);
} else {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists