[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201102152139.03451.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:39:03 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio: use __GFP_NOWARN for try_fill_recv in virtnet_poll
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:55:50 pm Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 15-02-11 20:41:29, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:05:27 pm Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > we have started seeing a lot of allocator messages complaining about
> > > failed allocations from virtnet_poll in soft IRQ. Could you consider the
> > > following patch, please?
> >
> > Do we really want to silence this? Isn't warning about it kind of the
> > point? Your network is probably sucking if this happens...
>
> What can user do about it? Is the low level memory allocator message
> very much usefull for him? Maybe we can add a printk_once in the fail
> path with some more useful and virtio specific message.
That's an argument against ever printing any message.
What we need to know is why does this happen with virtio_net and not other
cards? If it happens to them too, and they silently fall back, all good.
I want to make sure we're not papering over a real problem...
Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists