lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110215141326.GZ14984@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:13:26 +0200
From:	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
To:	Henrik Kretzschmar <henne@...htwindheim.de>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org,
	yinghai@...nel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com, robert.richter@....com,
	weidong.han@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] x86: ifdef enable_IR_x2apic() out

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 02:47:50PM +0100, Henrik Kretzschmar wrote:
> Am 14.02.2011 12:03, schrieb Ingo Molnar:
> > 
> > 
> > * Henrik Kretzschmar <henne@...htwindheim.de> wrote:
> > 
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> >>  extern void enable_IR_x2apic(void);
> >> +#endif
> > 
> > Cannot we use the CONFIG_X86_X2APIC Kconfig switch here, instead of CONFIG_X86_64?
> > 
> > enable_IR_x2apic() is not a 64-bit CPU feature.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > 	Ingo
> > 
> > 
> 
> Thats what I had liked also.
> 
> At the time you moved the apic code from x86/kernel it was exactly that way.
> But after that, in commit 937582382c71b75b29fbb92615629494e1a05ac0, it was explicitely moved out of
> CONFIG_X86_X2APIC, which made that function also compile on 32bit machines, even if its not used there.
> 
> Also commit ce69a784504222c3ab6f1b3c357d09ec5772127a enabled the x2apic without interrupt remapping,
> which means that CONFIG_X86_X2APIC depends on CONFIG_INTR_REMAP has been bypassed and so Kconfig is
> broken/not representing what happens to the code.
> 
Intel asked to leave Kconfig dependency in place.

> So since I dont have an x2apic and therefore cannot test changes,
> I decided for CONFIG_X86_64 without touching code which seems to work.
> 
> I wish I could offer something better here.
> 
> Greets,
> Henrik Kretzschmar
> 
> 
> 

--
			Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists