[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110215154612.GI3055@siel.b>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:46:12 +0100
From: torbenh <torbenh@....de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>,
bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Re: autogroup: sched_setscheduler() fails
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 02:16:00PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 04:54 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > sched, autogroup: fix CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED sched_setscheduler() failure.
> >
> > If CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED is set, __sched_setscheduler() fails due to autogroup
> > not allocating rt_runtime. Free unused/unusable rt_se and rt_rq, redirect RT
> > tasks to the root task group, and tell __sched_setscheduler() that it's ok.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
> > Reported-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Thanks, applied!
while this behaviour is certeinly necessary, i think this is a hack.
it fixes the problem for autogroups.
But its not fixed for things which want to control the cfs shares via
normal cgroups.
why isnt rt_runtime_us residing in a separate (new) subsystem ?
--
torben Hohn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists