linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 15/19] ARM: LPAE: use phys_addr_t instead of unsigned long for physical addresses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110215154819.GO4152@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:48:19 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/19] ARM: LPAE: use phys_addr_t instead of
	unsigned long for physical addresses

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 03:26:49PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> The conflict with the p2v branch is fairly hefty, but something like
> this should do (if you're happy I'll submit it to replace 6670/1):

I was thinking that was the case - which is why I wanted this split up
so this can be tackled separately.

> Note that because the v2p macros only work for lowmem, I've not bothered
> to add casts for the __v2p macros (rather, I've just changed the types
> of the static inline functions). This simplifies the code and means we
> can stay clear of the runtime fixup stuff.

This patch looks good enough, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/