[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1297800556_10580@mail4.comsite.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:09:16 -0600
From: Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
tj@...nel.org, isdn@...ux-pingi.de, jj@...osbits.net
Subject: Re: potential null pointer dereference in drivers/isdn/hisax/isdnl2.c
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:53:09 -0000, Dave Miler wrote:
> From: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
>
> > In drivers/isdn/hisax/isdnl2.c:l2_pull_iqueue() we have this:
> >
> > ...
> > skb = alloc_skb(oskb->len + i, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > memcpy(skb_put(skb, i), header, i);
> > ...
> >
> > If alloc_skb() fails and returns NULL then the second line will cause a
> > NULL pointer dereference - skb_put() gives the pointer to
> > skb_tail_pointer() which dereferences it.
> >
> > I'm not quite sure how this should be dealt with, so I'll just report it
> > rather than submit a patch. Happy bug fixing :-)
>
> Thanks Jesper, I'll fix this like so:
>
> --------------------
> hisax: Fix unchecked alloc_skb() return.
>
> Jesper Juhl noticed that l2_pull_iqueue() does not
> check to see if alloc_skb() fails.
>
> Fix this by first trying to reallocate the headroom
> if necessary, rather than later after we've made hard
> to undo state changes.
>
> Reported-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>
> ---
> drivers/isdn/hisax/isdnl2.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/isdn/hisax/isdnl2.c b/drivers/isdn/hisax/isdnl2.c
> index 0858791..98ac835 100644
> --- a/drivers/isdn/hisax/isdnl2.c
> +++ b/drivers/isdn/hisax/isdnl2.c
> @@ -1243,14 +1243,21 @@ l2_st7_tout_203(struct FsmInst *fi, int event, void *arg)
> st->l2.rc = 0;
> }
>
> +static int l2_hdr_space_needed(struct Layer2 *l2)
> +{
> + int len = test_bit(FLG_LAPD, &l2->flag) ? 2 : 1;
> +
> + return len + (test_bit(FLG_LAPD, &l2->flag) ? 2 : 1);
> +}
> +
That struck me as an funny way to write 2 * len, so I finally looked
at the code. I think one of those should be FLG_MOD128, but then
at that point why not use the existing l2headersize(l2, ui) with
ui = 0?
I see this is in linux-next of Feb 15, 2011.
milton
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists