[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110215170311.512b86f7@katamari>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:03:11 -0500
From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
dwmw2@...radead.org, hancockrwd@...il.com,
Larry.Finger@...inger.net
Subject: Re: b44 driver causes panic when using swiotlb
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 20:59:43 +0900
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> > Can you try this? b44 has the own bouncing mechanism so if swiotlb
> > returns an error, the driver can allocate an appropriate buffer.
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/swiotlb.c b/lib/swiotlb.c
> > index c47bbe1..93ca08b 100644
> > --- a/lib/swiotlb.c
> > +++ b/lib/swiotlb.c
> > @@ -686,8 +686,10 @@ dma_addr_t swiotlb_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
> > /*
> > * Ensure that the address returned is DMA'ble
> > */
> > - if (!dma_capable(dev, dev_addr, size))
> > - panic("map_single: bounce buffer is not DMA'ble");
> > + if (!dma_capable(dev, dev_addr, size)) {
> > + swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(dev, map, size, dir);
> > + dev_addr = swiotlb_virt_to_bus(dev, io_tlb_overflow_buffer);
> > + }
> >
> > return dev_addr;
> > }
>
> Ping, any chance to try this?
The user who reported the bug tried it and says that it works.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists