[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110216220921.GI22837@angua.secretlab.ca>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:09:21 -0700
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sodaville@...utronix.de,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, x86@...nel.org,
Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH OF 12/14] x86/rtc: don't register rtc if we the DT blob
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:59:00AM +0530, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> or we might end up with two device nodes for the same hardware.
>
> Cc: Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c | 3 +++
> include/linux/of.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c
> index 6f39cab..3f2ad26 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/bcd.h>
> #include <linux/pnp.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
>
> #include <asm/vsyscall.h>
> #include <asm/x86_init.h>
> @@ -236,6 +237,8 @@ static __init int add_rtc_cmos(void)
> }
> }
> #endif
> + if (of_have_populated_dt())
> + return 0;
Hmmm, should this hunk be moved to the next patch to preserve bisectability?
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists