linux-kernel - Re: [Patch] Revert block

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTik_kqob1-BzY+kguUz-NePYeyQeK-3Od3kyQJpi@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:29:25 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Revert block_dev read-only check

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com> wrote:
> This reverts commit 75f1dc0d076d1c1168f2115f1941ea627d38bd5a. The revert
> could not be done automatically because changes after that commit
> altered the code too much.

I really want to hear about _why_ something is reverted too. I'm not
taking patches without explanations. And explaining that it's
non-automatic (and why _that_ is), is not explaining why it needed to
be reverted in the first place.

Please. Think of the poor people who wonder why..

                 Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/