linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86, numa: seperate alloc_numa_distance from numa_reset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110216225111.GE29600@atj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Wed, 16 Feb 2011 23:51:11 +0100
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, numa: seperate alloc_numa_distance from
 numa_reset_distance.

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:57:36PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> 
> alloc code is much bigger the setting self.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>

Again, the same thing.  It just depends.  Maybe it's slightly more
readable this way.  Still falls in the realm of bikeshedding.

--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/