linux-kernel - [patch 154/176] tpm: Autodetect itpm devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110216002114.404264840@clark.kroah.org>
Date:	Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:22:02 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
	Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Subject: [patch 154/176] tpm: Autodetect itpm devices

2.6.36-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>

commit 3f0d3d016d89a5efb8b926d4707eb21fa13f3d27 upstream.

Some Lenovos have TPMs that require a quirk to function correctly. This can
be autodetected by checking whether the device has a _HID of INTC0102. This
is an invalid PNPid, and as such is discarded by the pnp layer - however
it's still present in the ACPI code, so we can pull it out that way. This
means that the quirk won't be automatically applied on non-ACPI systems,
but without ACPI we don't have any way to identify the chip anyway so I
don't think that's a great concern.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Tested-by: Andy Isaacson <adi@...apodia.org>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/wait.h>
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
 #include "tpm.h"
 
 #define TPM_HEADER_SIZE 10
@@ -78,6 +79,26 @@ enum tis_defaults {
 static LIST_HEAD(tis_chips);
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(tis_lock);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+static int is_itpm(struct pnp_dev *dev)
+{
+	struct acpi_device *acpi = pnp_acpi_device(dev);
+	struct acpi_hardware_id *id;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(id, &acpi->pnp.ids, list) {
+		if (!strcmp("INTC0102", id->id))
+			return 1;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+#else
+static int is_itpm(struct pnp_dev *dev)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
 static int check_locality(struct tpm_chip *chip, int l)
 {
 	if ((ioread8(chip->vendor.iobase + TPM_ACCESS(l)) &
@@ -474,6 +495,9 @@ static int tpm_tis_init(struct device *d
 		 "1.2 TPM (device-id 0x%X, rev-id %d)\n",
 		 vendor >> 16, ioread8(chip->vendor.iobase + TPM_RID(0)));
 
+	if (is_itpm(to_pnp_dev(dev)))
+		itpm = 1;
+
 	if (itpm)
 		dev_info(dev, "Intel iTPM workaround enabled\n");
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/