[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110216002108.691644624@clark.kroah.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:21:04 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
"Theodore Tso" <tytso@....edu>
Subject: [patch 096/176] ext4: fix memory leak in ext4_free_branches
2.6.36-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
commit 1c5b9e9065567876c2d4a7a16d78f0fed154a5bf upstream.
Commit 40389687 moved a call to ext4_forget() out of
ext4_free_branches and let ext4_free_blocks() handle calling
bforget(). But that change unfortunately did not replace the call to
ext4_forget() with brelse(), which was needed to drop the in-use count
of the indirect block's buffer head, which lead to a memory leak when
deleting files that used indirect blocks. Fix this.
Thanks to Hugh Dickins for pointing this out.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -4530,6 +4530,7 @@ static void ext4_free_branches(handle_t
(__le32 *) bh->b_data,
(__le32 *) bh->b_data + addr_per_block,
depth);
+ brelse(bh);
/*
* Everything below this this pointer has been
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists