linux-kernel - [110/115] sched: Fix cross-sched-class wakeup preemption

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110216014705.252861817@clark.kroah.org>
Date:	Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:46:16 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: [110/115] sched: Fix cross-sched-class wakeup preemption

2.6.32-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

Commit: 1e5a74059f9059d330744eac84873b1b99657008 upstream

Instead of dealing with sched classes inside each check_preempt_curr()
implementation, pull out this logic into the generic wakeup preemption
path.

This fixes a hang in KVM (and others) where we are waiting for the
stop machine thread to run ...

Reported-by: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
Tested-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1288891946.2039.31.camel@...top>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
 kernel/sched.c |   24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -594,11 +594,7 @@ struct rq {
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct rq, runqueues);
 
-static inline
-void check_preempt_curr(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
-{
-	rq->curr->sched_class->check_preempt_curr(rq, p, flags);
-}
+static void check_preempt_curr(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags);
 
 static inline int cpu_of(struct rq *rq)
 {
@@ -2392,6 +2388,24 @@ void task_oncpu_function_call(struct tas
 	preempt_enable();
 }
 
+static void check_preempt_curr(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
+{
+	const struct sched_class *class;
+
+	if (p->sched_class == rq->curr->sched_class) {
+		rq->curr->sched_class->check_preempt_curr(rq, p, flags);
+	} else {
+		for_each_class(class) {
+			if (class == rq->curr->sched_class)
+				break;
+			if (class == p->sched_class) {
+				resched_task(rq->curr);
+				break;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 /*
  * ->cpus_allowed is protected by either TASK_WAKING or rq->lock held.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/