linux-kernel - Re: pcmcia vs. MECR on pxa25x/sa1111

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110216072514.GB27029@comet.dominikbrodowski.net>
Date:	Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:25:14 +0100
From:	Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
To:	Pavel Machek <pma@...go.com>
Cc:	Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, cko@...go.com,
	eric.miao@...vell.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: pcmcia vs. MECR on pxa25x/sa1111

Russell,

On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 09:03:43AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> 
> After 2.6.34 changes, __pxa2xx_drv_pcmcia_probe() was replaced by
> sa1111_pcmcia_add(). That unfortunately means that configure_sockets()
> is not called, leading to MECR not being set properly, leading to
> strange crashes.
> 
> Tested on pxa255+sa1111, I do not have lubbock board nearby. Perhaps
> cleaner solution exists?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pma@...go.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> Here's updated version. I'd prefer not to do too extensive changes as
> I do not have lubbock nearby.

will you pick this up, or shall I?

Best,
	Dominik

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/