[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110216084105.GG16529@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:41:05 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, brgerst@...il.com, gorcunov@...il.com,
shaohui.zheng@...el.com, rientjes@...gle.com, hpa@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/26] x86-64, NUMA: Unify the rest of memblk registration
* Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:43:27AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Would be nice to have a version against the latest tip:x86/numa
> > tree, the current one conflicts in arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c with your
> > tree. Also, i suspect you want to propagate Yinghai's Acked-by's
> > into the commits?
>
> Acked-by added and rebased on top of the current x86/numa. Only one
> patch needed to be updated and the udpated version was just posted.
> The updated git branches are available at
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc.git x86_64-numa-unify
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc.git x86_64-numa-emu-unify
>
> The latter one is superset of the former.
>
> If you want the whole series reposted, please let me know.
No need if the patches did not change - but a diffstat is generally nice with pull
requests, so that mismatches between intention on your side and action on my side
can be detected sooner. Anyway, pulled it - thanks Tejun!
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists