linux-kernel - Re: [stable] [000/272] 2.6.37.1-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110216154850.GB3921@dumpdata.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:48:50 -0500
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:	Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, stable-review@...nel.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [stable] [000/272] 2.6.37.1-stable review

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 04:31:54PM +0100, Stefan Bader wrote:
> On 02/16/2011 03:53 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:41:18AM +0100, Stefan Bader wrote:
> >> I had been submitted the following two backports for 2.6.37.y (only for that)
> >> but do not see them in the current batch. I know 270+ is already big and they
> >> may come later. Just wanted to ensure they have not fallen through the cracks.
> > 
> > Hmm, do you want to provide the other variant please?
> > 
> > cf04d120d9413de581437cf9a29f138ec1178f65
> 
> That was the second patch. I just submitted both to keep them in line with what
> went to upstream.

Ohh. Duh! Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/