linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.38-rc5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:22:39 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.38-rc5

Le mercredi 16 février 2011 à 07:46 -0800, Linus Torvalds a écrit :
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Using this kernel on my dev machine (2x4x2 cpus), I hit BUG_ON() in
> > fs/namei.c:1461 on my kernel build (make -j16)
> 
> Uhhuh. We replaced one BUG_ON() with another.
> 
> And I think it's a really silly problem too: when Al moved the
> 
>         /* We drop rcu-walk here */
>         if (nameidata_dentry_drop_rcu_maybe(nd, path->dentry))
>                 return -ECHILD;
> 
> test into do_follow_link(), he _should_ have moved the BUG_ON() in
> there too, methinks. He didn't, and as a result the BUG_ON() is now
> before the "drop_rcu_maybe".
> 
> This patch should fix it. Al? Comments?
> 

Yes it does, lets see Al patch ;)

> (Of course, we could just remove the BUG_ON() entirely, but
> considering that this is still fragile new code I'd rather leave it
> in)
> 
>                                Linus


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/