[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1297873359.30541.5.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:22:39 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.38-rc5
Le mercredi 16 février 2011 à 07:46 -0800, Linus Torvalds a écrit :
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Using this kernel on my dev machine (2x4x2 cpus), I hit BUG_ON() in
> > fs/namei.c:1461 on my kernel build (make -j16)
>
> Uhhuh. We replaced one BUG_ON() with another.
>
> And I think it's a really silly problem too: when Al moved the
>
> /* We drop rcu-walk here */
> if (nameidata_dentry_drop_rcu_maybe(nd, path->dentry))
> return -ECHILD;
>
> test into do_follow_link(), he _should_ have moved the BUG_ON() in
> there too, methinks. He didn't, and as a result the BUG_ON() is now
> before the "drop_rcu_maybe".
>
> This patch should fix it. Al? Comments?
>
Yes it does, lets see Al patch ;)
> (Of course, we could just remove the BUG_ON() entirely, but
> considering that this is still fragile new code I'd rather leave it
> in)
>
> Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists