linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.38-rc5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1297874864.30541.40.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date:	Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:47:44 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	npiggin@...nel.dk
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.38-rc5

Le mercredi 16 février 2011 à 16:39 +0000, Al Viro a écrit :
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 08:33:32AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Does it make tons of conceptual sense to pass in 'inode' to
> > do_follow_link? No, it's clearly redundant information, which is the
> > whole point of the BUG_ON(). But it does allow that extra shared
> > sanity test, and we _could_ also then do
> > 
> >   -       if (!IS_ERR(cookie) && path->dentry->d_inode->i_op->put_link)
> >   -               path->dentry->d_inode->i_op->put_link(path->dentry,
> > nd, cookie);
> >   +       if (!IS_ERR(cookie) && inode->i_op->put_link)
> >   +               inode->i_op->put_link(path->dentry, nd, cookie);
> > 
> > since we've verified that 'inode' is 'path->dentry->d_inode', and all
> > of those should be stable over all the calls (in the non-RCU case,
> > which we are in).
> > 
> > I dunno. I don't care _deeply_, but I do have to say that I much liked
> > how you moved the
> > 
> >     if (nameidata_dentry_drop_rcu_maybe(nd, path->dentry))
> >       ..
> > 
> > into do_follow_link(). I think it made it clearer that do_follow_link
> > (and __do_follow_link()) aren't done with RCU.
> 
> OK, I can live with that.  Consider me convinced, let's go with your variant.
> Speaking of ugliness: Nick, why the _fuck_ have you reverted non-create case
> in do_filp_open() to do_path_lookup()?

I tested both (Linus/Al) versions, please feel free to add

Tested-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/