| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20110216001425.970393397@clark.kroah.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:11:06 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Cliff Wickman <cpw@....com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: [009/272] x86, UV, BAU: Extend for more than 16 cpus per socket
2.6.37-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Cliff Wickman <cpw@....com>
commit cfa60917f0ba6eca83f41aef3cb4a7dd7736ac9f upstream.
Fix a hard-coded limit of a maximum of 16 cpu's per socket.
The UV Broadcast Assist Unit code initializes by scanning the
cpu topology of the system and assigning a master cpu for each
socket and UV hub. That scan had an assumption of a limit of 16
cpus per socket. With Westmere we are going over that limit.
The UV hub hardware will allow up to 32.
If the scan finds the system has gone over that limit it returns
an error and we print a warning and fall back to doing TLB
shootdowns without the BAU.
Signed-off-by: Cliff Wickman <cpw@....com>
LKML-Reference: <E1PZol7-0000mM-77@...09.americas.sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h | 9 +++++----
arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h
@@ -26,20 +26,22 @@
* BAU_SB_DESCRIPTOR_BASE register, set 1 is located at BASE + 512,
* set 2 is at BASE + 2*512, set 3 at BASE + 3*512, and so on.
*
- * We will use 31 sets, one for sending BAU messages from each of the 32
+ * We will use one set for sending BAU messages from each of the
* cpu's on the uvhub.
*
* TLB shootdown will use the first of the 8 descriptors of each set.
* Each of the descriptors is 64 bytes in size (8*64 = 512 bytes in a set).
*/
+#define MAX_CPUS_PER_UVHUB 64
+#define MAX_CPUS_PER_SOCKET 32
+#define UV_ADP_SIZE 64 /* hardware-provided max. */
+#define UV_CPUS_PER_ACT_STATUS 32 /* hardware-provided max. */
#define UV_ITEMS_PER_DESCRIPTOR 8
/* the 'throttle' to prevent the hardware stay-busy bug */
#define MAX_BAU_CONCURRENT 3
-#define UV_CPUS_PER_ACT_STATUS 32
#define UV_ACT_STATUS_MASK 0x3
#define UV_ACT_STATUS_SIZE 2
-#define UV_ADP_SIZE 32
#define UV_DISTRIBUTION_SIZE 256
#define UV_SW_ACK_NPENDING 8
#define UV_NET_ENDPOINT_INTD 0x38
@@ -100,7 +102,6 @@
* number of destination side software ack resources
*/
#define DEST_NUM_RESOURCES 8
-#define MAX_CPUS_PER_NODE 32
/*
* completion statuses for sending a TLB flush message
*/
--- a/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
@@ -1341,7 +1341,7 @@ uv_activation_descriptor_init(int node,
/*
* each bau_desc is 64 bytes; there are 8 (UV_ITEMS_PER_DESCRIPTOR)
- * per cpu; and up to 32 (UV_ADP_SIZE) cpu's per uvhub
+ * per cpu; and one per cpu on the uvhub (UV_ADP_SIZE)
*/
bau_desc = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct bau_desc) * UV_ADP_SIZE
* UV_ITEMS_PER_DESCRIPTOR, GFP_KERNEL, node);
@@ -1490,7 +1490,7 @@ calculate_destination_timeout(void)
/*
* initialize the bau_control structure for each cpu
*/
-static void __init uv_init_per_cpu(int nuvhubs)
+static int __init uv_init_per_cpu(int nuvhubs)
{
int i;
int cpu;
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ static void __init uv_init_per_cpu(int n
struct bau_control *smaster = NULL;
struct socket_desc {
short num_cpus;
- short cpu_number[16];
+ short cpu_number[MAX_CPUS_PER_SOCKET];
};
struct uvhub_desc {
unsigned short socket_mask;
@@ -1540,6 +1540,10 @@ static void __init uv_init_per_cpu(int n
sdp = &bdp->socket[socket];
sdp->cpu_number[sdp->num_cpus] = cpu;
sdp->num_cpus++;
+ if (sdp->num_cpus > MAX_CPUS_PER_SOCKET) {
+ printk(KERN_EMERG "%d cpus per socket invalid\n", sdp->num_cpus);
+ return 1;
+ }
}
for (uvhub = 0; uvhub < nuvhubs; uvhub++) {
if (!(*(uvhub_mask + (uvhub/8)) & (1 << (uvhub%8))))
@@ -1570,6 +1574,12 @@ static void __init uv_init_per_cpu(int n
bcp->uvhub_master = hmaster;
bcp->uvhub_cpu = uv_cpu_hub_info(cpu)->
blade_processor_id;
+ if (bcp->uvhub_cpu >= MAX_CPUS_PER_UVHUB) {
+ printk(KERN_EMERG
+ "%d cpus per uvhub invalid\n",
+ bcp->uvhub_cpu);
+ return 1;
+ }
}
nextsocket:
socket++;
@@ -1595,6 +1605,7 @@ nextsocket:
bcp->congested_reps = congested_reps;
bcp->congested_period = congested_period;
}
+ return 0;
}
/*
@@ -1625,7 +1636,10 @@ static int __init uv_bau_init(void)
spin_lock_init(&disable_lock);
congested_cycles = microsec_2_cycles(congested_response_us);
- uv_init_per_cpu(nuvhubs);
+ if (uv_init_per_cpu(nuvhubs)) {
+ nobau = 1;
+ return 0;
+ }
uv_partition_base_pnode = 0x7fffffff;
for (uvhub = 0; uvhub < nuvhubs; uvhub++)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists