[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110216200449.1EB9618020E@magilla.sf.frob.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:04:49 -0800 (PST)
From: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Mark Wielaard <mjw@...hat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...il.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Julien Desfossez <julien.desfossez@...ymtl.ca>,
dominique.toupin@...csson.com, ltt-dev@...ts.casi.polymtl.ca,
systemtap@...rces.redhat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, hpa@...or.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de,
andi@...stfloor.org, rth@...hat.com,
masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
avi@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, sam@...nborg.org,
ddaney@...iumnetworks.com, michael@...erman.id.au,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: Porting "jump labels" to userspace (was: Re: [ltt-dev] LTTng-UST
vs SystemTap userspace tracing benchmarks)
IMHO there is not really so much to the in-kernel implementation that it's
worth attempting to reuse the code in userland. Pretty much all the work
is in the details of the implementation that would naturally differ a lot
in a different context. If you understand the mechanism and the machine
details, then implementing it well for a userland context is not a big deal
and is cleaner to do from scratch than shoe-horning kernel-centric code
into a wildly different context.
Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists