[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1297932820.16356.1317.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:53:40 +0000
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad@...nel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"Stefano Stabellini" <Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] xen-pcifront: Sanity check the
MSI/MSI-X values
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 22:17 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> Check the returned vector values for any values that are
> odd or plain incorrect (say vector value zero), and if so
> print a warning. Also fixup the return values.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c b/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c
> index 3a5a6fc..6acf6ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c
> @@ -277,13 +277,20 @@ static int pci_frontend_enable_msix(struct pci_dev *dev,
> if (likely(!err)) {
> if (likely(!op.value)) {
> /* we get the result */
> - for (i = 0; i < nvec; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < nvec; i++) {
> + if (op.msix_entries[i].vector <= 0) {
> + dev_warn(&dev->dev, "MSI-X entry %d" \
> + " is zero!\n", i);
The test says "<= 0" but the text says "== 0". Perhaps
dev_warn(&dev->dev, "MSI-X entry %d has invalid vector %d\n",
i, op.msix_entries[i].vector);
>
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + continue;
Do we need / should we set *(*vector+i) to something to indicate its
invalidness rather than leave it potentially uninitialised?
> + }
> *(*vector+i) = op.msix_entries[i].vector;
BTW does the double indirection of the vector serve a purpose?
Everywhere I can see just updates *(*vector+i), I can't see any realloc
of the array itself etc.
Removing the extra level of indirection leads to vector[i] = foo instead
which is much easier on the eye.
> - return 0;
> + }
> + return err;
> } else {
> printk(KERN_DEBUG "enable msix get value %x\n",
> op.value);
> - return op.value;
> + return err;
I think all of these "return err"s can now be pulled out to the end of
the function? makes it clearer what the return is.
> }
> } else {
> dev_err(&dev->dev, "enable msix get err %x\n", err);
> @@ -325,6 +332,10 @@ static int pci_frontend_enable_msi(struct pci_dev *dev, int **vector)
> err = do_pci_op(pdev, &op);
> if (likely(!err)) {
> *(*vector) = op.value;
> + if (op.value <= 0) {
> + dev_warn(&dev->dev, "MSI entry is zero!\n");
Same comment re <= vs == 0.
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + }
> } else {
> dev_err(&dev->dev, "pci frontend enable msi failed for dev "
> "%x:%x\n", op.bus, op.devfn);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists