linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/25] mm: Preemptibility -v7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:06:39 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Yanmin Zhang <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/25] mm: Preemptibility -v7

On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 18:31 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>  - figure out what to do with sparc's tlb_batch lack of ->fullmm

David, how does this look?

---
Index: linux-2.6/arch/sparc/mm/tlb.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/sparc/mm/tlb.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/sparc/mm/tlb.c
@@ -43,7 +43,8 @@ void flush_tlb_pending(void)
 	put_cpu_var(tlb_batch);
 }
 
-void tlb_batch_add(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr, pte_t *ptep, pte_t orig)
+void tlb_batch_add(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr, 
+		   pte_t *ptep, pte_t orig, int fullmm)
 {
 	struct tlb_batch *tb = &get_cpu_var(tlb_batch);
 	unsigned long nr;
@@ -77,12 +78,10 @@ void tlb_batch_add(struct mm_struct *mm,
 
 no_cache_flush:
 
-	/*
-	if (tb->fullmm) {
+	if (fullmm) {
 		put_cpu_var(tlb_batch);
 		return;
 	}
-	*/
 
 	nr = tb->tlb_nr;
 
Index: linux-2.6/arch/sparc/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/sparc/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
+++ linux-2.6/arch/sparc/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
@@ -655,9 +655,11 @@ static inline int pte_special(pte_t pte)
 #define pte_unmap(pte)			do { } while (0)
 
 /* Actual page table PTE updates.  */
-extern void tlb_batch_add(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr, pte_t *ptep, pte_t orig);
+extern void tlb_batch_add(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr, 
+			  pte_t *ptep, pte_t orig, int fullmm);
 
-static inline void set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte)
+static inline void __set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, 
+			     pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte, int fullmm)
 {
 	pte_t orig = *ptep;
 
@@ -670,12 +672,19 @@ static inline void set_pte_at(struct mm_
 	 *             and SUN4V pte layout, so this inline test is fine.
 	 */
 	if (likely(mm != &init_mm) && (pte_val(orig) & _PAGE_VALID))
-		tlb_batch_add(mm, addr, ptep, orig);
+		tlb_batch_add(mm, addr, ptep, orig, fullmm);
 }
 
+#define set_pte_at(mm,addr,ptep,pte)	\
+	__set_pte_at((mm), (addr), (ptep), (pte), 0)
+
 #define pte_clear(mm,addr,ptep)		\
 	set_pte_at((mm), (addr), (ptep), __pte(0UL))
 
+#define __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_CLEAR_NOT_PRESENT_FULL
+#define pte_clear_not_present_full(mm,addr,ptep,fullmm)	\
+	__set_pte_at((mm), (addr), (ptep), __pte(0UL), (fullmm))
+
 #ifdef DCACHE_ALIASING_POSSIBLE
 #define __HAVE_ARCH_MOVE_PTE
 #define move_pte(pte, prot, old_addr, new_addr)				\

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/