[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110217124304.GA27504@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:43:04 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Subject: [kbuild] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:42:59 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > failed like this:
> >
> > x86_64-linux-gcc: arch/x86/lib/memmove_64.c: No such file or directory
> >
> > Caused by commit 9599ec0471deae24044241e2173090d2cbc0e899 ("x86-64, mem:
> > Convert memmove() to assembly file and fix return value bug") interacting
> > with our build system.
> >
> > After removing arch/x86/lib/.memmove_64.o.cmd (left over from the build
> > before merging the tip tree) from my object tree, it built correctly.
>
> I am still getting this (of course).
You reported this as a -tip build failure - but it appears to be some sort of kbuild
bug/artifact, right? There was a leftover .memmove_64.o.cmd file from an old tree.
When jumping between kernel versions via git checkout a 'make mrproper' is generally
needed. In most cases 'make' will figure things out but it's not always guaranteed.
So for example there are version transitions where a stale include/asm links could
cause build problems.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists