linux-kernel - [PATCH, resend] x86/PCI: don't export a _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <4D5D562A0200007800032744@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Date:	Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:08:58 +0000
From:	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...ell.com>
To:	<mingo@...e.hu>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	<arozansk@...hat.com>, <mchehab@...hat.com>,
	"Michal Marek" <mmarek@...e.cz>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH, resend] x86/PCI: don't export a __devinit function

Exporting a __devinit function (pcibios_scan_specific_bus()) isn't
correct. (Michal, any reason why modpost only warns about exported
__init functions?) Short of being able to think of a better solution,
and short of making the whole call tree (reaching into the arch-
independent part of the PCI subsystem) non-__devinit, export the
symbol only when HOTPLUG is enabled (which is always the case for non-
expert configurations), use section mismatch avoidance annotations for
that case (knowing that __devinit functions will not be discarded),
and mark the symbol __devinit only in the !HOTPLUG case.

Consequently, EDAC_I7CORE (consuming the export) then has to depend on
HOTPLUG. A fundamental question of course if whether this driver has
to use that function in the first place (i.e. whether it wouldn't be
better to just remove the export) - the problem it tries to address
happens on other systems too, but the PCI bus the devices in question
live on isn't necessarily bus 255. For the affected system I have, the
alternative approach is to set pcibios_last_bus from __pci_mmcfg_init()
based on the highest bus number on segment 0 being covered by MCFG.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
Cc: Aristeu Sergio <arozansk@...hat.com>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>

---
 arch/x86/pci/legacy.c |   21 ++++++++++++++++++---
 drivers/edac/Kconfig  |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- 2.6.38-rc5/arch/x86/pci/legacy.c
+++ 2.6.38-rc5-x86-pci-section-conflict/arch/x86/pci/legacy.c
@@ -36,7 +36,23 @@ int __init pci_legacy_init(void)
 	return 0;
 }

-void __devinit pcibios_scan_specific_bus(int busn)
+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG
+static void __ref
+#else
+static inline void
+#endif
+_pci_scan_bus_on_node(int busno, int node)
+{
+	pci_scan_bus_on_node(busno, &pci_root_ops, node);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pcibios_scan_specific_bus);
+void
+#else
+void __devinit
+#endif
+pcibios_scan_specific_bus(int busn)
 {
 	int devfn;
 	long node;
@@ -51,12 +67,11 @@ void __devinit pcibios_scan_specific_bus
 		    l != 0x0000 && l != 0xffff) {
 			DBG("Found device at %02x:%02x [%04x]\n", busn, devfn, l);
 			printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Discovered peer bus %02x\n", busn);
-			pci_scan_bus_on_node(busn, &pci_root_ops, node);
+			_pci_scan_bus_on_node(busn, node);
 			return;
 		}
 	}
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pcibios_scan_specific_bus);

 int __init pci_subsys_init(void)
 {
--- 2.6.38-rc5/drivers/edac/Kconfig
+++ 2.6.38-rc5-x86-pci-section-conflict/drivers/edac/Kconfig
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ config EDAC_I5400

 config EDAC_I7CORE
 	tristate "Intel i7 Core (Nehalem) processors"
-	depends on EDAC_MM_EDAC && PCI && X86
+	depends on EDAC_MM_EDAC && PCI && X86 && HOTPLUG
 	select EDAC_MCE
 	help
 	  Support for error detection and correction the Intel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/