[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1297973501.23343.953.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:11:41 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
2nddept-manager@....hitachi.co.jp
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] ftrace: Use -mfentry when supported (this is
for x86_64 right now)
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 01:07 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> I just thought that frequent stop-machine is not so good from the user's
> POV. I agree that disabled probe ignoring the call is enough.
> Maybe, it could be done with the similar mechanism of jump optimization.
I thought jump optimization still calls stop_machine too?
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists